People who demonstrated a stronger brain response to certain brain regions when receiving individually tailored smoking cessation messages were more likely to quit smoking four months later, a new study finds.
The new U-M study underscores the importance of delivering individually tailored public health messages to curb unhealthy behaviors, says principal investigator Hannah Faye Chua, who led the study as a research assistant professor at the School of Public Health (SPH).
It also begins to uncover the underlying neural reasons why these individually tailored messages are so much more effective than a one-size-fits-all approach, says Chua, who now works in the private sector. The study appears online in the journal Nature Neuroscience.
Researchers have known for 15 years that public health messages tailored for a person’s individuality work better at curbing unhealthy behaviors, but until now, they haven’t known why.
Chua and the research team hypothesized that portions of the brain activated during self-related processing also were engaged when people received individually tailored health messages, and that this brain activity accounted for the increased effectiveness of tailored messages.
For the study, the research group assessed 91 people who wanted to stop smoking, and based on those answers they designed an individual smoking cessation program for each subject.
Next, researchers imaged subjects’ brains with MRI to see which portions responded to tailored and untailored messages about smoking cessation, and also to neutral messages. They then compared brain responses during a self-appraisal task in which participants, still in MRI, made yes-no judgments to self-related statements such as “I am shy” or “I am athletic.”
Several brain regions activated during the self-related task also appeared to activate during the tailored messages in the same group of smokers. After the scan, participants completed the full smoking intervention program that was designed for each subject.
“The bottom line is that people who are more likely to activate self-related regions of the brain during tailored message processing, particularly dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, are more likely to quit four months after,” Chua says.
The findings have broad public health implications. “The bigger picture of this is advertisers are increasing using functional MRI to test advertising,” says Vic Strecher, an SPH professor who worked on the project. “If you can imagine that people who create fast food or who sell cigarettes are doing this in an effort to convey a stronger message, we really need to better understand the ways our health messages can be more effective.”
Chua stresses that researchers don’t want to use functional MRI as a predictor for success of public health messages; it’s simply not economically feasible. They do, however, want to better understand and eventually map the portions of the brain responsible for making decisions that will improve their health.
Judy Dooley, operations analyst, Division of Executive Education, on challenging herself at work: “I like coming up with complex queries and elegant reporting solutions. ... I just love being a resource for others.”
Making Democracy Work: Slovakia in the Last Decade, a panel featuring past and present Slovak Ambassadors to the United States including Ronald Weiser, 4 p.m. March 15, Palmer Commons Forum Hall.