Red on yellow, kill a fellow. Red on black, friend of Jack.
That folk rhyme is supposed to help people distinguish venomous coral snakes from several non-venomous “mimics,” animals that discourage predators by deceptively imitating a dangerous species.
Problem is, the rhyme is unreliable due to the vast amount of color and pattern variation, called color polymorphism, found in both coral snakes and their mimics. The harmless ground snake, a common coral snake mimic, displays four strikingly different color patterns, only one of which closely resembles its dangerous red-and-black-and-yellow-banded counterpart.
If a mimicry system offers protection from predators, then why hasn’t evolution eliminated the “failed mimics,” such as ground snakes sporting color patterns that don’t remotely resemble a coral snake? That’s the puzzle that U-M evolutionary biologist Alison Davis Rabosky has spent the last four years trying to solve.
“Logic predicts that non-mimics should by eaten preferentially by predators and, given enough time, you should end up with a single color type in the population. So the widespread co-occurrence of mimic and non-mimic color patterns is a puzzling and longstanding evolutionary paradox,” said Rabosky, an assistant research scientist in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and an assistant curator of herpetology at the Museum of Zoology.
While Rabosky and colleague Christian Cox of the University of Virginia don’t claim to have fully resolved the paradox, they did gain insights that help explain the persistence of non-mimic color patterns in ground snakes, especially rare patterns. It turns out that if you’re a ground snake, displaying a rare color pattern also provides an evolutionary edge.
Rabosky and Cox spent years flipping thousands of rocks in search of ground snakes in the central and western United States and in Mexico. They collected more than 350 live ground snakes and studied some 2,500 specimens from 12 museum collections.
A single population of ground snakes can contain individuals with four different color patterns, called morphs: plain brown, red striped, black banded, and the red-and-black-banded “mimic morph,” which resembles the coral snake.
Some of the museum specimens examined by Rabosky and Cox date back more than a century. By tracing changes in color patterns within populations over time, they determined that the color morph in a given population gradually became more common.
“Basically the predators get a search image for the most common morph in that population, and that’s the one they’ll hit until that morph becomes rare. Then the predators switch to whatever is now the most common morph,” Rabosky said.
Predators of ground snakes include hawks and other raptors, crows and ravens, and blue jays. Ground snakes typically grow to a length of around 8 inches.
“This is what’s called a frequency-dependent system, and it makes it hard to lose any of these morphs once they appear,” Rabosky said. “The rare morphs have an advantage because they are rare, so gradually their numbers will start to increase again, and the end result is a system with a lot of polymorphism.”
Specifically, Rabosky and Cox found that negative frequency-dependent selection, in which each color type is favored only when it is rare, is the primary reason there are multiple color patterns in ground snakes. Their findings were published online June 26 in The American Naturalist.
Stephen Stefanac, associate dean for patient services at the School of Dentistry, on what inspires him: "I am genuinely inspired by our students. They are extraordinary people — talented, motivated and eager to learn."
Noam Chomsky: “Language Use and Design: conflicts and their significance,” 7 p.m. July 11, Rackham Auditorium, part of the 2013 Linguistics Institute.